Direct Land Compensation Agreement Guide

A direct land compensation agreement is a common question for land users when the State allocates their land to a business for an investment project. Typically, a compensation amount negotiated with a business is expected to align more closely with market value. This article provides a detailed analysis of the process, conditions, and legal risks when a business enters into a direct land compensation agreement.

Cases Where a Business Can Directly Negotiate Compensation

The Land Law 2024 introduced significant changes, clarifying the cases where a business can directly negotiate compensation and receive land use rights from individuals to implement a project. According to Article 127(1) of the Land Law 2024, an investor may enter into a direct land compensation agreement in three specific cases:

• Case 1: The project is not subject to State land acquisition for socio-economic development in the national or public interest, as defined in Article 79 of the Land Law 2024. This includes conventional production and business projects such as factories, commercial residential areas, and shopping centers. In this scenario, the investor directly negotiates the transfer price and form of land use rights with the user without State intervention.
• Case 2: The project is a commercial housing development, where the investor is only permitted to negotiate the receipt of residential land use rights.
• Case 3: The project does not use State budget capital but falls under the land acquisition cases in Article 79 of the Land Law 2024. Here, the investor chooses the negotiation option to receive land use rights instead of proposing State-led acquisition.

Understanding these regulations allows businesses to be more proactive in project implementation, ensures a balance of interests, and secures consensus from land users, fostering a transparent and effective investment environment.

>>> See more at: All types of assets on land are compensated when the state recovers land

Conditions for a Direct Land Compensation Agreement

Once a project is identified as eligible for direct negotiation, the business must meet several conditions to ensure the process is transparent, lawful, and consistent with public planning. Based on Article 127(3) of the Land Law 2024 and guiding regulations, a business can proceed with a direct land compensation agreement if it meets these fundamental conditions:

• The project aligns with the approved and published district-level land use plan.
• The investor meets all conditions for land allocation, land lease, or conversion of land use purpose as stipulated in Article 122(2) of the Land Law 2024. For commercial housing projects, the agreement must be for receiving residential land use rights.
• There is a written approval from the provincial or communal People’s Committee authorizing the agreement on receiving land use rights for the project.

Additionally, the land user is eligible for compensation only if they meet one of the conditions under Article 95(2) of the Land Law 2024:

• Possesses a decision on land allocation or land lease from a competent authority.
• Holds documents regarding land use rights that are valid for the issuance of a Certificate.
• Received land use rights through a legal transfer but has not yet completed the registration procedures.
• Uses the land according to an agreement in a mortgage contract or an auction result and has fulfilled all financial obligations.
• For land with multiple owners, there must be consensus or a valid power of attorney to negotiate the direct land compensation agreement.

In summary, the eligibility for a business to negotiate directly involves a comprehensive set of criteria, from planning compliance and investor capacity to state approval and the clear legal status of the land parcel.

>>> See more at: How is compensation when the State recovers land from businesses?

The Procedure for a Direct Land Compensation Agreement

After satisfying all legal conditions, the business begins the critical phase of negotiating directly with land users. To ensure this process is effective and lawful, the following steps must be followed:

1. Define Project Scope and Identify Land Users: The business must create a detailed list of all land parcels, owners, and the area required for the project.
2. Conduct Direct Negotiations: The business negotiates directly with each land-holding household. The negotiation should cover the transfer price, form of compensation (cash, land, resettlement, or a combination), handover timeline, and other support terms.
3. Execute Contracts: The parties sign a land use rights transfer contract, land lease contract, or capital contribution contract using land use rights. The contract must be notarized or authenticated as required by law. The business must also address all related taxes and fees.

This negotiation process must be voluntary, equitable, and compliant with all legal provisions governing contracts and the transfer of land use rights.

Legal Risks in a Direct Land Compensation Agreement

While the mechanism for a direct land compensation agreement offers flexibility, it also carries legal risks for both the business and the land user. Key risks include:

• The agreement may be declared void by a competent authority if it fails to meet the conditions of Article 127 of the Land Law 2024 or violates legal prohibitions under Article 123 of the Civil Code 2015.
• Agreements concerning land types that do not match the project’s purpose or exceed the permitted scope pose a significant legal risk.
• A court may nullify the contract if it finds evidence of deceit, coercion, or exploitation.
• Disputes over the compensation amount and payment method are common. Unlike state-led acquisition with clear dispute resolution frameworks, direct agreements are governed by civil law, making transparency in negotiations crucial.
• Conflicts often arise over the land handover schedule and resettlement support conditions due to different interpretations of the contract.
• Resolving disputes through litigation is time-consuming, expensive, and can severely impact the project timeline.

The legal risks associated with a direct land compensation agreement are varied, ranging from the legality of the agreement itself to contractual content and implementation disputes.

Advisory and Support Services at Long Phan Consulting

Long Phan Consulting provides professional advisory services for direct compensation negotiations between businesses and land users under the latest regulations.

Legal Assessment and Risk Analysis

• Advising on the legal conditions required for a business to execute a direct land compensation agreement.
• Auditing the legal records of the land and project to identify and evaluate potential risks before negotiations begin.
• Assessing the overall viability and legal standing for initiating a direct land compensation agreement.

Contractual and Negotiation Support

• Drafting, reviewing, and optimizing compensation agreements and related contracts to safeguard client interests.
• Representing clients as their authorized agent to negotiate terms and sign legally binding agreements.
• Providing strategic legal counsel throughout the negotiation process to achieve favorable outcomes.

Dispute Resolution and Implementation

• Mediating and resolving disputes that may arise during or after the negotiation phase.
• Representing clients in court or arbitration proceedings should disputes escalate.
• Assisting with the post-agreement process to ensure all contractual terms are implemented smoothly and correctly.

With extensive experience in successfully guiding numerous businesses through the direct land compensation agreement process, Long Phan Consulting delivers optimal solutions. Our experts are available 24/7 for free consultations on complex issues.

>>> See more at: Accurate Land Planning Verification

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a land user refuse to enter an agreement if they disagree with the terms?

Yes. The fundamental principle of civil transactions is freedom and voluntarism in commitment and agreement (Article 3(2), Civil Code 2015). Land users have the right to refuse if they find the terms unreasonable.

Besides cash, are other forms of compensation or support available?

Yes. Under the principle of freedom of contract, the parties can agree on any form of compensation that does not violate the law or social ethics. This can include resettlement land, housing, vocational training support, or any combination agreed upon by both parties.

If land is co-owned, is the consent of all owners required for the agreement?

Yes, it is mandatory. According to Article 218 of the Civil Code 2015 on the disposition of common property, the transfer of co-owned land use rights requires the written consent of all co-owners, unless otherwise agreed or provided by law.

What happens if the business delays compensation payment after signing the contract?

The matter is handled according to the contract’s breach of obligation clauses. Additionally, under Article 357(1) of the Civil Code 2015, the defaulting party must pay interest on the late amount for the duration of the delay. The land user has the right to file a lawsuit to demand payment and compensation for damages.

Can I negotiate compensation if my land is mortgaged at a bank?

Yes, but it requires the written consent of the mortgagee (the bank). According to Article 321(5) of the Civil Code 2015, the mortgagor may only sell, exchange, or gift the mortgaged asset with the mortgagee’s consent.

Conclusion

A business is permitted to enter into a direct land compensation agreement in the cases specified in Article 127 of the Land Law 2024. Long Phan Consulting is ready to assist with professional legal services to protect your legal rights during this process. Please contact our hotline at 1900636389 for a free consultation and detailed quote.