
Sign up for consultation
Long Phan Consulting observes a growing number of businesses posting recruitment notices with inflated salaries or misleading job descriptions to speed up hiring. This practice constitutes false recruitment advertising and may violate Article 16 of the Labor Code 2019 and Clause 9, Article 8 of the Law on Advertising 2012. Businesses may face substantial administrative fines or criminal liability for repeat offenses. This article examines the recruitment content businesses must review and the competent enforcement authorities under Vietnam’s labor and advertising laws.

Legal notes:
False recruitment advertising occurs when a job posting misrepresents the actual job, salary, title, or working conditions that a business can offer a candidate. Two parallel groups of legal rules govern this conduct.
First, Article 16 of the Labor Code 2019 requires employers to truthfully inform employees of the job, workplace, working conditions, working hours, rest periods, and occupational safety. This duty also covers wages, form of payment, social insurance, and other matters directly related to signing a labor contract that the employee requests. This duty arises from the moment a recruitment notice is posted, not only at contract signing.
Second, under advertising law, a recruitment notice is also a form of advertising for a business’s employment services. Clause 9, Article 8 of the Law on Advertising 2012 is now amended by Law No. 75/2025/QH15, effective from January 1, 2026. It prohibits advertising that is inaccurate or misleading about an organization’s or individual’s business capacity, service capacity, quality, utility, or announced method of service. This provision applies directly to job descriptions and benefit commitments in recruitment notices.
When both duties are breached simultaneously, a business faces not only administrative sanctions but also direct labor dispute risk with candidates or employees who signed contracts based on misleading content. Reviewing recruitment content should therefore be treated as a mandatory compliance step, not an optional part of the human resources process.
To avoid violating Article 16 of the Labor Code 2019 and Clause 9, Article 8 of the Law on Advertising 2012, businesses must compare each group of content below against actual job conditions. This review must occur before publishing a recruitment notice on any channel. This is a content-level review, carried out before the format-approval process described later.
The job description in the recruitment notice must match the internally approved job description. This falls within the “information on the job, workplace, and working conditions” that Article 16 of the Labor Code 2019 requires employers to disclose truthfully. Workplace location, working hours, and support equipment must be stated accurately, without exaggerating working conditions to attract candidates.
The announced salary must be based on the business’s actual pay scale or remuneration policy, consistent with the duty to disclose “wages and form of payment” under Article 16 of the Labor Code 2019. If the salary includes multiple components, such as base pay, allowances, and commission, the notice must separate them clearly. Combining figures to suggest a higher income also falls within the prohibition under Clause 9, Article 8 of the Law on Advertising 2012.
The job title posted must match the actual position, without using a more impressive title than the real rank to appeal to candidates’ expectations. Competency requirements must reflect the actual scope of the role. Businesses should avoid lowering stated requirements and then assigning a workload far beyond the original description. This pattern also constitutes misleading information about the method of service under Clause 9, Article 8 of the Law on Advertising 2012.
Phrases such as “sky-high income,” “easy work, high pay,” or “high income with no experience required” are typical signs of false recruitment advertising, as they lack verifiable grounds. If a competent authority requests an explanation under Clause 9, Article 8 of the Law on Advertising 2012, the business must prove the basis for such commitments. Failure to do so means the conduct will be classified as misleading advertising and sanctioned under the penalty levels set out later in this article.

When a candidate files a complaint or a periodic inspection occurs, two groups of authorities intervene depending on the aspect violated. The advertising management authority handles posted content, while the labor management authority handles conduct related to recruitment and contract signing. Identifying the correct authority helps businesses respond proactively rather than reactively when asked to explain.
For advertising management, Clause 2, Article 4 of the Law on Advertising 2012 assigns the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism to manage advertising activities nationwide. This assignment is detailed in Decree No. 342/2025/ND-CP, effective from February 15, 2026. Under this decree, provincial People’s Committees are responsible for inspecting, examining, and handling advertising violations within their local jurisdiction, including recruitment notices posted on platforms under their management.
For labor management, the authority to sanction violations related to recruitment, labor contract signing, and labor management is now set out in Decree No. 283/2026/ND-CP. This decree takes effect from September 10, 2026, replacing Decree No. 12/2022/ND-CP. It assigns the power to record and sanction violations to labor inspectors and other authorized titles under the decree’s chapter on sanctioning authority.
Having identified the mandatory review content and the competent authorities, businesses should establish an internal review process that operates regularly and applies to every recruitment notice before it is published externally. The process below consists of five steps, carried out in the following order.
>>>See more: Consulting services for drafting labor sublease contracts

Penalties depend on the violation: advertising-sector fines apply under Decree No. 38/2021/ND-CP, labor-sector fines apply under Decree No. 283/2026/ND-CP, and criminal liability may arise under the Penal Code 2015 for repeat or serious violations.
| Violation | Legal Basis | Penalty for Individuals | Penalty for Organizations |
| Advertising that is inaccurate or misleading about the capacity to provide a service or job | Clause 5, Article 34, Decree No. 38/2021/ND-CP, as amended by Decree No. 128/2022/ND-CP | VND 60–80 million | VND 120–160 million |
| Collecting money from a candidate for participating in recruitment | Point b, Clause 1, Article 11, Decree No. 283/2026/ND-CP | VND 1–3 million | VND 2–6 million |
| Withholding documents or requiring an unlawful deposit when signing a contract | Clause 2, Article 15, Decree No. 283/2026/ND-CP | VND 20–25 million | VND 40–50 million |
| Fraudulent advertising, repeated after an administrative penalty | Article 197, Penal Code 2015 (amended 2017) | Fine of VND 10–100 million or non-custodial reform for up to 3 years; additional penalty of VND 5–50 million fine and a 1–5 year occupational ban | N/A |
| Using deceit to appropriate a candidate’s property, such as fraudulent recruitment fees | Article 174, Penal Code 2015 (amended 2017) | Non-custodial reform for up to 3 years or imprisonment from 6 months to 20 years, or life imprisonment depending on the value appropriated | N/A |
The organizational penalty is twice the individual penalty under the general principle in these decrees. A business may also face remedial measures, such as correcting or removing violating content under Decree No. 38/2021/ND-CP, or refunding amounts unlawfully collected from employees under Article 11 of Decree No. 283/2026/ND-CP.
Skipping the recruitment content review step exposes a business to three groups of risk at once, ranging from state sanctions to reputational damage that is difficult to measure. The three points below describe each risk group in order of severity.
As shown in the penalty table above, a business may be fined up to VND 160 million for a single violation of Clause 5, Article 34 of Decree No. 38/2021/ND-CP. This is in addition to the risk of prosecution under Article 197 or Article 174 of the Penal Code 2015 for repeat offenses or signs of misappropriating an employee’s property.
When the actual job or salary does not match what the recruitment notice announced, employees have grounds to claim a breach. The business would have breached its duty to provide truthful information under Article 16 of the Labor Code 2019, giving employees a right to complain, sue for compensation, or unilaterally terminate the labor contract.
On employer review platforms, feedback about false recruitment advertising spreads quickly and directly affects a business’s ability to attract talent in the long run. This risk exists even before any competent authority under Decree No. 342/2025/ND-CP or Decree No. 283/2026/ND-CP imposes an official penalty.
To minimize risks arising from misleading recruitment advertisements, businesses should consider using dedicated legal services instead of relying solely on internal experience for manual reviews. Long Phan Consulting assists businesses with the following specific matters:
Clients may send their case documents via email info@longphanpmt.com or Zalo 0906.735.386 for a preliminary assessment.
Below are common questions raised by businesses and employees when considering the sanctions applicable to misleading recruitment advertising, answered based on the legal grounds presented in the preceding sections.
Yes. If a business has previously been administratively sanctioned for deceptive advertising and subsequently reoffends, the violator may face criminal liability under Article 197 of the 2015 Criminal Code (as amended and supplemented in 2017), with a fine ranging from VND 10 million to VND 100 million or non-custodial reform for up to 3 years.
Provincial-level People’s Committees and state authorities responsible for advertising may impose sanctions under Decree No. 342/2025/ND-CP. Labor authorities may sanction violations relating to recruitment and employment contract execution under Decree No. 283/2026/ND-CP, which took effect on September 10, 2026.
Potentially. If the business cannot provide evidence supporting the advertised salary or nature of the job, this phrase may be considered misleading to employees and may violate Clause 9, Article 8 of the 2012 Law on Advertising.
An employee may file a complaint with the local state labor management authority. Charging employees fees during recruitment may be sanctioned under Article 11 of Decree No. 283/2026/ND-CP, and the business may also be required to refund the amount collected.
Current law does not prescribe a specific retention period for recruitment advertisements. However, businesses should retain them at least throughout the administrative violation limitation period under Decree No. 38/2021/ND-CP and Decree No. 283/2026/ND-CP so that supporting evidence is available for explanations when necessary.
Yes. Under the general principles set out in Decree No. 38/2021/ND-CP and Decree No. 283/2026/ND-CP, the monetary fine applicable to an organization is twice the fine applicable to an individual for the same violation.
Misleading recruitment advertising is not merely a matter of business ethics; it may constitute a violation subject to strict enforcement under labor and advertising laws, particularly following the effective date of Decree No. 283/2026/ND-CP on September 10, 2026. Businesses should establish internal review procedures and verify each recruitment advertisement against actual employment conditions, Article 16 of the 2019 Labor Code, and Clause 9, Article 8 of the 2012 Law on Advertising before publication. This can help minimize legal risks and protect the reputation of the employer brand. Long Phan Consulting is ready to assist businesses in reviewing recruitment content and developing legally compliant recruitment procedures. Contact 1900636389 for assistance.
📚 This article is professionally advised based on the following legal instruments:









Note: The content of the articles published on the website of Long Phan Investment Consulting Company is for reference only regarding the application of legal policies. Depending on the time, subject, and amendments, supplements, and replacements of legal policies and legal documents, the consulting content may no longer be appropriate for the situation you are facing or need legal advice on. In case you need specific and in-depth advice according to each case or incident, please contact us through the methods below. With our enthusiasm and dedication, we believe that Long Phan will be a reliable solution provider for our clients.
Leave your email to receive the latest information from us
CONTACT: 1900.63.63.89
Copyright 2024 © Long Phan Consulting Company. All rights reserved.